Major shipping companies, including Hapag-Lloyd, are urging the IMO to ban unsustainable biofuels like palm and soy oil. They argue these fuels worsen emissions when deforestation and land use are considered.
The concern is that crop-based biofuels are the cheapest option to meet emission targets. However, they can produce two to three times more emissions than fossil fuels due to land-use changes.
Waste-based biofuels, like used cooking oil, are not a viable alternative. A single cargo ship’s journey could require the yearly waste oil output from thousands of restaurants.
Relying on crop-based biofuels can also harm food security and biodiversity. Expanding farmland for these fuels leads to deforestation and rising food prices.
Several countries have already restricted or banned palm and soy biofuels. The EU’s FuelEU Maritime initiative excludes food-based crops from its sustainable fuel policies.
The coalition urges the IMO to follow suit and remove crop-based biofuels from its green shipping regulations. They also call for redirecting financial support to truly sustainable alternatives.
Green hydrogen and its derivatives, like e-methanol, offer better long-term solutions. These fuels can cut emissions without harming ecosystems or food supplies.
With upcoming IMO discussions, the industry sees a chance to set stricter sustainability standards. Prioritizing renewable fuels over crops will ensure real progress toward decarbonization.
